Elenco
Scopri nuove persone e i loro amici a quattro zampe, e fai nuove amicizie
-
Effettua l'accesso per mettere mi piace, condividere e commentare!
-
0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 688 Views
3
-
0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 752 Views
2
-
fine vineifine vinei๐1 Commenti 0 condivisioni 2K Views4
-
Napoleon's death mask is cast in bronze. The original cast was created 40 hours after his death in 1821. During this era, it was customary to create a death mask for prominent leaders when they died.
A mixture of wax or plaster was applied to Napoleon's face and removed once it had solidified.
Subsequent copies were made from this impression by casting them. The origins and current locations of the original cast molds are shrouded in mystery and controversy.
Napoleon's death mask is cast in bronze. The original cast was created 40 hours after his death in 1821. During this era, it was customary to create a death mask for prominent leaders when they died. A mixture of wax or plaster was applied to Napoleon's face and removed once it had solidified. Subsequent copies were made from this impression by casting them. The origins and current locations of the original cast molds are shrouded in mystery and controversy.0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 871 Views2
-
Bro kept fainting after police found 50 kilosBro kept fainting after police found 50 kilos ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 1K Views 228
5
-
Fela Kuti is the Most Persecuted Musician in History. He was arrested over 200 times, and appeared in court 356 times for mostly criticising the Nigerian Government.
1,000 soldiers attacked his property in 1977.
He performed on stage in bandages, even after being assaulted.Fela Kuti is the Most Persecuted Musician in History. He was arrested over 200 times, and appeared in court 356 times for mostly criticising the Nigerian Government. 1,000 soldiers attacked his property in 1977. He performed on stage in bandages, even after being assaulted.0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 2K Views3
-
Depression rate by country:
1. Greenland - 6.61%
2. Greece - 6.52%
3. Spain - 6.04%
4. Portugal - 5.88%
5. Palestine - 5.75%
5. Tunisia - 5.75%
7. Bahrain - 5.52%
8. Morocco - 5.49%
9. Iran - 5.48%
10. Lithuania - 5.42%
~
11. Ukraine - 5.25%
12. Monaco - 5.21%
13. Latvia - 5.16%
16. Suriname - 5.1%
17. Estonia - 5.09%
19. Lebanon - 5.06%
20. Australia - 5.05%
21. Belarus - 5.04%
22. United Kingdom - 5.02%
24. Finland - 5.00%
25. Ireland - 4.99%
26. Sweden - 4.98%
29. USa - 4.92%
30. Kuwait - 4.90%
31. Saudi Arabia - 4.90%
33. France - 4.74%
34. Switzerland - 4.72%
35. Bangladesh - 4.67%
38. Andorra - 4.65%
39. Nepal - 4.64%
40. Equatorial Guinea - 4.63%
43. Italy - 4.62%
44. Turkey - 4.60%
45. Israel - 4.55%
47. Uganda - 4.48%
48. South Africa - 4.45%
49. Denmark - 4.41%
50. Netherlands - 4.41%
51. Syria - 4.39%
52. Belgium - 4.36%
53. Oman - 4.33%
54. Germany - 4.32%
55. Brazil - 4.29%
56. Chile - 4.28%
57. Slovenia - 4.28%
63. Rwanda - 4.20%
64. Yemen - 4.20%
65. Jordan - 4.19%
67. Botswana - 4.16%
68. Croatia - 4.13%
71. Mongolia - 4.07%
72. Bhutan - 4.06%
73. Luxembourg - 4.02%
76. Malaysia - 3.99%
77. Comoros - 3.97%
78. Afghanistan - 3.96%
79. Barbados - 3.96%
80. Austria - 3.95%
84. Russia - 3.91%
85. Hungary - 3.89%
86. Iraq - 3.89%
88. Egypt - 3.87%
89. Eswatini - 3.87%
90. Mexico - 3.87%
92. Norway - 3.85%
93. Czech Republic - 3.84%
98. Canada - 3.74%
99. Bulgaria - 3.73%
100. Kazakhstan - 3.72%
103. Thailand - 3.70%
104. India - 3.69%
105. Serbia - 3.69%
106. Grenada - 3.68%
109. China - 3.67%
112. El Salvador - 3.61%
114. Taiwan - 3.59%
117. Slovakia - 3.56%
120. Venezuela - 3.53%
121. Iceland - 3.52%
124. Romania - 3.51%
126. South Sudan - 3.48%
130. Jamaica - 3.44%
131. Ethiopia - 3.41%
132. Guatemala - 3.41%
133. Burundi - 3.39%
139. Kyrgyzstan - 3.31%
140. Somalia - 3.31%
141. North Korea - 3.30%
145. Bolivia - 3.26%
146. Namibia - 3.26%
148. Sri Lanka - 3.26%
149. Pakistan - 3.23%
153. Maldives - 3.15%
154. Panama - 3.15%
155. Senegal - 3.15%
158. Uzbekistan - 3.12%
159. Turkmenistan - 3.11%
162. Albania - 3.05%
164. Fiji - 3.01%
165. Poland - 2.98%
166. Mauritania - 2.94%
167. Cambodia - 2.89%
170. Vietnam - 2.83%
173. Nigeria - 2.76%
174. Zimbabwe - 2.76%
175. Argentina - 2.72%
177. Philippines - 2.69%
178. Laos - 2.67%
179. Japan - 2.66%
180. Niger - 2.65%
181. South Korea - 2.64%
182. Indonesia - 2.63%
187. Mali - 2.46%
188. Singapore - 2.45%
189. East Timor - 2.41%
190. Peru - 2.36%
191. Myanmar - 2.28%
192. Brunei - 1.83%
According to the Global Burden of Disease study, IHME, as measured by percentage of the population affected.Depression rate by country: 1. ๐ฌ๐ฑ Greenland - 6.61% 2. ๐ฌ๐ท Greece - 6.52% 3. ๐ช๐ธ Spain - 6.04% 4. ๐ต๐น Portugal - 5.88% 5. ๐ต๐ธ Palestine - 5.75% 5. ๐น๐ณ Tunisia - 5.75% 7. ๐ง๐ญ Bahrain - 5.52% 8. ๐ฒ๐ฆ Morocco - 5.49% 9. ๐ฎ๐ท Iran - 5.48% 10. ๐ฑ๐น Lithuania - 5.42% ~ 11. ๐บ๐ฆ Ukraine - 5.25% 12. ๐ฒ๐จ Monaco - 5.21% 13. ๐ฑ๐ป Latvia - 5.16% 16. ๐ธ๐ท Suriname - 5.1% 17. ๐ช๐ช Estonia - 5.09% 19. ๐ฑ๐ง Lebanon - 5.06% 20. ๐ฆ๐บ Australia - 5.05% 21. ๐ง๐พ Belarus - 5.04% 22. ๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom - 5.02% 24. ๐ซ๐ฎ Finland - 5.00% 25. ๐ฎ๐ช Ireland - 4.99% 26. ๐ธ๐ช Sweden - 4.98% 29. ๐บ๐ธ USa - 4.92% 30. ๐ฐ๐ผ Kuwait - 4.90% 31. ๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia - 4.90% 33. ๐ซ๐ท France - 4.74% 34. ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland - 4.72% 35. ๐ง๐ฉ Bangladesh - 4.67% 38. ๐ฆ๐ฉ Andorra - 4.65% 39. ๐ณ๐ต Nepal - 4.64% 40. ๐ฌ๐ถ Equatorial Guinea - 4.63% 43. ๐ฎ๐น Italy - 4.62% 44. ๐น๐ท Turkey - 4.60% 45. ๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel - 4.55% 47. ๐บ๐ฌ Uganda - 4.48% 48. ๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa - 4.45% 49. ๐ฉ๐ฐ Denmark - 4.41% 50. ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands - 4.41% 51. ๐ธ๐พ Syria - 4.39% 52. ๐ง๐ช Belgium - 4.36% 53. ๐ด๐ฒ Oman - 4.33% 54. ๐ฉ๐ช Germany - 4.32% 55. ๐ง๐ท Brazil - 4.29% 56. ๐จ๐ฑ Chile - 4.28% 57. ๐ธ๐ฎ Slovenia - 4.28% 63. ๐ท๐ผ Rwanda - 4.20% 64. ๐พ๐ช Yemen - 4.20% 65. ๐ฏ๐ด Jordan - 4.19% 67. ๐ง๐ผ Botswana - 4.16% 68. ๐ญ๐ท Croatia - 4.13% 71. ๐ฒ๐ณ Mongolia - 4.07% 72. ๐ง๐น Bhutan - 4.06% 73. ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg - 4.02% 76. ๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia - 3.99% 77. ๐ฐ๐ฒ Comoros - 3.97% 78. ๐ฆ๐ซ Afghanistan - 3.96% 79. ๐ง๐ง Barbados - 3.96% 80. ๐ฆ๐น Austria - 3.95% 84. ๐ท๐บ Russia - 3.91% 85. ๐ญ๐บ Hungary - 3.89% 86. ๐ฎ๐ถ Iraq - 3.89% 88. ๐ช๐ฌ Egypt - 3.87% 89. ๐ธ๐ฟ Eswatini - 3.87% 90. ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico - 3.87% 92. ๐ณ๐ด Norway - 3.85% 93. ๐จ๐ฟ Czech Republic - 3.84% 98. ๐จ๐ฆ Canada - 3.74% 99. ๐ง๐ฌ Bulgaria - 3.73% 100. ๐ฐ๐ฟ Kazakhstan - 3.72% 103. ๐น๐ญ Thailand - 3.70% 104. ๐ฎ๐ณ India - 3.69% 105. ๐ท๐ธ Serbia - 3.69% 106. ๐ฌ๐ฉ Grenada - 3.68% 109. ๐จ๐ณ China - 3.67% 112. ๐ธ๐ป El Salvador - 3.61% 114. ๐น๐ผ Taiwan - 3.59% 117. ๐ธ๐ฐ Slovakia - 3.56% 120. ๐ป๐ช Venezuela - 3.53% 121. ๐ฎ๐ธ Iceland - 3.52% 124. ๐ท๐ด Romania - 3.51% 126. ๐ธ๐ธ South Sudan - 3.48% 130. ๐ฏ๐ฒ Jamaica - 3.44% 131. ๐ช๐น Ethiopia - 3.41% 132. ๐ฌ๐น Guatemala - 3.41% 133. ๐ง๐ฎ Burundi - 3.39% 139. ๐ฐ๐ฌ Kyrgyzstan - 3.31% 140. ๐ธ๐ด Somalia - 3.31% 141. ๐ฐ๐ต North Korea - 3.30% 145. ๐ง๐ด Bolivia - 3.26% 146. ๐ณ๐ฆ Namibia - 3.26% 148. ๐ฑ๐ฐ Sri Lanka - 3.26% 149. ๐ต๐ฐ Pakistan - 3.23% 153. ๐ฒ๐ป Maldives - 3.15% 154. ๐ต๐ฆ Panama - 3.15% 155. ๐ธ๐ณ Senegal - 3.15% 158. ๐บ๐ฟ Uzbekistan - 3.12% 159. ๐น๐ฒ Turkmenistan - 3.11% 162. ๐ฆ๐ฑ Albania - 3.05% 164. ๐ซ๐ฏ Fiji - 3.01% 165. ๐ต๐ฑ Poland - 2.98% 166. ๐ฒ๐ท Mauritania - 2.94% 167. ๐ฐ๐ญ Cambodia - 2.89% 170. ๐ป๐ณ Vietnam - 2.83% 173. ๐ณ๐ฌ Nigeria - 2.76% 174. ๐ฟ๐ผ Zimbabwe - 2.76% 175. ๐ฆ๐ท Argentina - 2.72% 177. ๐ต๐ญ Philippines - 2.69% 178. ๐ฑ๐ฆ Laos - 2.67% 179. ๐ฏ๐ต Japan - 2.66% 180. ๐ณ๐ช Niger - 2.65% 181. ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea - 2.64% 182. ๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia - 2.63% 187. ๐ฒ๐ฑ Mali - 2.46% 188. ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore - 2.45% 189. ๐น๐ฑ East Timor - 2.41% 190. ๐ต๐ช Peru - 2.36% 191. ๐ฒ๐ฒ Myanmar - 2.28% 192. ๐ง๐ณ Brunei - 1.83% According to the Global Burden of Disease study, IHME, as measured by percentage of the population affected.0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 2K Views4
-
OFFICIAL: letter sent to the Premier League regarding scrapping VAR.
"Wolves have formally submitted a resolution to the Premier League to trigger a vote at the league's AGM in June, on the removal of VAR from the start of the 2024/25 season.
The introduction of VAR in 2019/20 was a decision made in good faith and with the best interests of football and the Premier League at its heart. However, it has led to numerous unintended negative consequences that are damaging the relationship between fans and football, and undermining the value of the Premier League brand, which include:
• Impact on goal celebrations and the spontaneous passion that makes football special.
• Frustration and confusion inside stadiums due to lengthy VAR checks and poor communication.
•A more hostile atmosphere with protests, booing of the Premier League anthem and chants against VAR.
• Overreach of VAR's original purpose to correct clear and obvious mistakes, now overanalysing subjective decisions and compromising the game's fluidity and integrity.
• Diminished accountability of on-field officials, due to safety net of VAR, leading to an erosion of authority on the pitch.
• Continued errors despite VAR, with supporters unable to accept human error after multiple views and replays, damaging confidence in officiating standards.
• Disruption of the Premier League's fast pace with lengthy VAR checks and more added time, causing matches to run excessively long.
• Constant discourse about VAR decisions often overshadowing the match itself, and tarnishing the reputation of the league.
• Erosion of trust and reputation, with VAR fuelling completely nonsensical allegations of corruption.
The decision to table the resolution has come after careful consideration and with the utmost respect for the Premier League, PGMOL and our fellow competitors.
There is no blame to be placed - we are all just looking for the best possible outcome for football - and all stakeholders have been working hard to try and make the introduction of additional technology a success.
However, after five seasons of VAR in the Premier League it is time for a constructive and critical debate on its future.
Our position is that the price we are paying for a small increase in accuracy is at odds with the spirit of our game, and as a result we should remove it from the 2024/25 season onwards."๐จ๐บ OFFICIAL: letter sent to the Premier League regarding scrapping VAR. "Wolves have formally submitted a resolution to the Premier League to trigger a vote at the league's AGM in June, on the removal of VAR from the start of the 2024/25 season. The introduction of VAR in 2019/20 was a decision made in good faith and with the best interests of football and the Premier League at its heart. However, it has led to numerous unintended negative consequences that are damaging the relationship between fans and football, and undermining the value of the Premier League brand, which include: • Impact on goal celebrations and the spontaneous passion that makes football special. • Frustration and confusion inside stadiums due to lengthy VAR checks and poor communication. •A more hostile atmosphere with protests, booing of the Premier League anthem and chants against VAR. • Overreach of VAR's original purpose to correct clear and obvious mistakes, now overanalysing subjective decisions and compromising the game's fluidity and integrity. • Diminished accountability of on-field officials, due to safety net of VAR, leading to an erosion of authority on the pitch. • Continued errors despite VAR, with supporters unable to accept human error after multiple views and replays, damaging confidence in officiating standards. • Disruption of the Premier League's fast pace with lengthy VAR checks and more added time, causing matches to run excessively long. • Constant discourse about VAR decisions often overshadowing the match itself, and tarnishing the reputation of the league. • Erosion of trust and reputation, with VAR fuelling completely nonsensical allegations of corruption. The decision to table the resolution has come after careful consideration and with the utmost respect for the Premier League, PGMOL and our fellow competitors. There is no blame to be placed - we are all just looking for the best possible outcome for football - and all stakeholders have been working hard to try and make the introduction of additional technology a success. However, after five seasons of VAR in the Premier League it is time for a constructive and critical debate on its future. Our position is that the price we are paying for a small increase in accuracy is at odds with the spirit of our game, and as a result we should remove it from the 2024/25 season onwards."1 Commenti 0 condivisioni 1K Views
5
-
Bae and IBae and I0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 1K Views
6