• Love
    1
    0 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 751 Ansichten
  • Love
    Like
    3
    0 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 688 Ansichten
  • Like
    Love
    2
    0 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 752 Ansichten
  • fine vinei
    fine vinei😍
    Like
    4
    1 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 2KB Ansichten
  • Napoleon's death mask is cast in bronze. The original cast was created 40 hours after his death in 1821. During this era, it was customary to create a death mask for prominent leaders when they died.

    A mixture of wax or plaster was applied to Napoleon's face and removed once it had solidified.

    Subsequent copies were made from this impression by casting them. The origins and current locations of the original cast molds are shrouded in mystery and controversy.
    Napoleon's death mask is cast in bronze. The original cast was created 40 hours after his death in 1821. During this era, it was customary to create a death mask for prominent leaders when they died. A mixture of wax or plaster was applied to Napoleon's face and removed once it had solidified. Subsequent copies were made from this impression by casting them. The origins and current locations of the original cast molds are shrouded in mystery and controversy.
    Like
    2
    0 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 871 Ansichten
  • Bro kept fainting after police found 50 kilos
    Bro kept fainting after police found 50 kilos 😭😭😭😭
    Like
    Haha
    5
    0 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 1KB Ansichten 228
  • Fela Kuti is the Most Persecuted Musician in History. He was arrested over 200 times, and appeared in court 356 times for mostly criticising the Nigerian Government.

    1,000 soldiers attacked his property in 1977.

    He performed on stage in bandages, even after being assaulted.
    Fela Kuti is the Most Persecuted Musician in History. He was arrested over 200 times, and appeared in court 356 times for mostly criticising the Nigerian Government. 1,000 soldiers attacked his property in 1977. He performed on stage in bandages, even after being assaulted.
    Like
    3
    0 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 2KB Ansichten
  • Depression rate by country:

    1. Greenland - 6.61%
    2. Greece - 6.52%
    3. Spain - 6.04%
    4. Portugal - 5.88%
    5. Palestine - 5.75%
    5. Tunisia - 5.75%
    7. Bahrain - 5.52%
    8. Morocco - 5.49%
    9. Iran - 5.48%
    10. Lithuania - 5.42%
    ~
    11. Ukraine - 5.25%
    12. Monaco - 5.21%
    13. Latvia - 5.16%
    16. Suriname - 5.1%
    17. Estonia - 5.09%
    19. Lebanon - 5.06%
    20. Australia - 5.05%
    21. Belarus - 5.04%
    22. United Kingdom - 5.02%
    24. Finland - 5.00%
    25. Ireland - 4.99%
    26. Sweden - 4.98%
    29. USa - 4.92%
    30. Kuwait - 4.90%
    31. Saudi Arabia - 4.90%
    33. France - 4.74%
    34. Switzerland - 4.72%
    35. Bangladesh - 4.67%
    38. Andorra - 4.65%
    39. Nepal - 4.64%
    40. Equatorial Guinea - 4.63%
    43. Italy - 4.62%
    44. Turkey - 4.60%
    45. Israel - 4.55%
    47. Uganda - 4.48%
    48. South Africa - 4.45%
    49. Denmark - 4.41%
    50. Netherlands - 4.41%
    51. Syria - 4.39%
    52. Belgium - 4.36%
    53. Oman - 4.33%
    54. Germany - 4.32%
    55. Brazil - 4.29%
    56. Chile - 4.28%
    57. Slovenia - 4.28%
    63. Rwanda - 4.20%
    64. Yemen - 4.20%
    65. Jordan - 4.19%
    67. Botswana - 4.16%
    68. Croatia - 4.13%
    71. Mongolia - 4.07%
    72. Bhutan - 4.06%
    73. Luxembourg - 4.02%
    76. Malaysia - 3.99%
    77. Comoros - 3.97%
    78. Afghanistan - 3.96%
    79. Barbados - 3.96%
    80. Austria - 3.95%
    84. Russia - 3.91%
    85. Hungary - 3.89%
    86. Iraq - 3.89%
    88. Egypt - 3.87%
    89. Eswatini - 3.87%
    90. Mexico - 3.87%
    92. Norway - 3.85%
    93. Czech Republic - 3.84%
    98. Canada - 3.74%
    99. Bulgaria - 3.73%
    100. Kazakhstan - 3.72%
    103. Thailand - 3.70%
    104. India - 3.69%
    105. Serbia - 3.69%
    106. Grenada - 3.68%
    109. China - 3.67%
    112. El Salvador - 3.61%
    114. Taiwan - 3.59%
    117. Slovakia - 3.56%
    120. Venezuela - 3.53%
    121. Iceland - 3.52%
    124. Romania - 3.51%
    126. South Sudan - 3.48%
    130. Jamaica - 3.44%
    131. Ethiopia - 3.41%
    132. Guatemala - 3.41%
    133. Burundi - 3.39%
    139. Kyrgyzstan - 3.31%
    140. Somalia - 3.31%
    141. North Korea - 3.30%
    145. Bolivia - 3.26%
    146. Namibia - 3.26%
    148. Sri Lanka - 3.26%
    149. Pakistan - 3.23%
    153. Maldives - 3.15%
    154. Panama - 3.15%
    155. Senegal - 3.15%
    158. Uzbekistan - 3.12%
    159. Turkmenistan - 3.11%
    162. Albania - 3.05%
    164. Fiji - 3.01%
    165. Poland - 2.98%
    166. Mauritania - 2.94%
    167. Cambodia - 2.89%
    170. Vietnam - 2.83%
    173. Nigeria - 2.76%
    174. Zimbabwe - 2.76%
    175. Argentina - 2.72%
    177. Philippines - 2.69%
    178. Laos - 2.67%
    179. Japan - 2.66%
    180. Niger - 2.65%
    181. South Korea - 2.64%
    182. Indonesia - 2.63%
    187. Mali - 2.46%
    188. Singapore - 2.45%
    189. East Timor - 2.41%
    190. Peru - 2.36%
    191. Myanmar - 2.28%
    192. Brunei - 1.83%

    According to the Global Burden of Disease study, IHME, as measured by percentage of the population affected.
    Depression rate by country: 1. 🇬🇱 Greenland - 6.61% 2. 🇬🇷 Greece - 6.52% 3. 🇪🇸 Spain - 6.04% 4. 🇵🇹 Portugal - 5.88% 5. 🇵🇸 Palestine - 5.75% 5. 🇹🇳 Tunisia - 5.75% 7. 🇧🇭 Bahrain - 5.52% 8. 🇲🇦 Morocco - 5.49% 9. 🇮🇷 Iran - 5.48% 10. 🇱🇹 Lithuania - 5.42% ~ 11. 🇺🇦 Ukraine - 5.25% 12. 🇲🇨 Monaco - 5.21% 13. 🇱🇻 Latvia - 5.16% 16. 🇸🇷 Suriname - 5.1% 17. 🇪🇪 Estonia - 5.09% 19. 🇱🇧 Lebanon - 5.06% 20. 🇦🇺 Australia - 5.05% 21. 🇧🇾 Belarus - 5.04% 22. 🇬🇧 United Kingdom - 5.02% 24. 🇫🇮 Finland - 5.00% 25. 🇮🇪 Ireland - 4.99% 26. 🇸🇪 Sweden - 4.98% 29. 🇺🇸 USa - 4.92% 30. 🇰🇼 Kuwait - 4.90% 31. 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia - 4.90% 33. 🇫🇷 France - 4.74% 34. 🇨🇭 Switzerland - 4.72% 35. 🇧🇩 Bangladesh - 4.67% 38. 🇦🇩 Andorra - 4.65% 39. 🇳🇵 Nepal - 4.64% 40. 🇬🇶 Equatorial Guinea - 4.63% 43. 🇮🇹 Italy - 4.62% 44. 🇹🇷 Turkey - 4.60% 45. 🇮🇱 Israel - 4.55% 47. 🇺🇬 Uganda - 4.48% 48. 🇿🇦 South Africa - 4.45% 49. 🇩🇰 Denmark - 4.41% 50. 🇳🇱 Netherlands - 4.41% 51. 🇸🇾 Syria - 4.39% 52. 🇧🇪 Belgium - 4.36% 53. 🇴🇲 Oman - 4.33% 54. 🇩🇪 Germany - 4.32% 55. 🇧🇷 Brazil - 4.29% 56. 🇨🇱 Chile - 4.28% 57. 🇸🇮 Slovenia - 4.28% 63. 🇷🇼 Rwanda - 4.20% 64. 🇾🇪 Yemen - 4.20% 65. 🇯🇴 Jordan - 4.19% 67. 🇧🇼 Botswana - 4.16% 68. 🇭🇷 Croatia - 4.13% 71. 🇲🇳 Mongolia - 4.07% 72. 🇧🇹 Bhutan - 4.06% 73. 🇱🇺 Luxembourg - 4.02% 76. 🇲🇾 Malaysia - 3.99% 77. 🇰🇲 Comoros - 3.97% 78. 🇦🇫 Afghanistan - 3.96% 79. 🇧🇧 Barbados - 3.96% 80. 🇦🇹 Austria - 3.95% 84. 🇷🇺 Russia - 3.91% 85. 🇭🇺 Hungary - 3.89% 86. 🇮🇶 Iraq - 3.89% 88. 🇪🇬 Egypt - 3.87% 89. 🇸🇿 Eswatini - 3.87% 90. 🇲🇽 Mexico - 3.87% 92. 🇳🇴 Norway - 3.85% 93. 🇨🇿 Czech Republic - 3.84% 98. 🇨🇦 Canada - 3.74% 99. 🇧🇬 Bulgaria - 3.73% 100. 🇰🇿 Kazakhstan - 3.72% 103. 🇹🇭 Thailand - 3.70% 104. 🇮🇳 India - 3.69% 105. 🇷🇸 Serbia - 3.69% 106. 🇬🇩 Grenada - 3.68% 109. 🇨🇳 China - 3.67% 112. 🇸🇻 El Salvador - 3.61% 114. 🇹🇼 Taiwan - 3.59% 117. 🇸🇰 Slovakia - 3.56% 120. 🇻🇪 Venezuela - 3.53% 121. 🇮🇸 Iceland - 3.52% 124. 🇷🇴 Romania - 3.51% 126. 🇸🇸 South Sudan - 3.48% 130. 🇯🇲 Jamaica - 3.44% 131. 🇪🇹 Ethiopia - 3.41% 132. 🇬🇹 Guatemala - 3.41% 133. 🇧🇮 Burundi - 3.39% 139. 🇰🇬 Kyrgyzstan - 3.31% 140. 🇸🇴 Somalia - 3.31% 141. 🇰🇵 North Korea - 3.30% 145. 🇧🇴 Bolivia - 3.26% 146. 🇳🇦 Namibia - 3.26% 148. 🇱🇰 Sri Lanka - 3.26% 149. 🇵🇰 Pakistan - 3.23% 153. 🇲🇻 Maldives - 3.15% 154. 🇵🇦 Panama - 3.15% 155. 🇸🇳 Senegal - 3.15% 158. 🇺🇿 Uzbekistan - 3.12% 159. 🇹🇲 Turkmenistan - 3.11% 162. 🇦🇱 Albania - 3.05% 164. 🇫🇯 Fiji - 3.01% 165. 🇵🇱 Poland - 2.98% 166. 🇲🇷 Mauritania - 2.94% 167. 🇰🇭 Cambodia - 2.89% 170. 🇻🇳 Vietnam - 2.83% 173. 🇳🇬 Nigeria - 2.76% 174. 🇿🇼 Zimbabwe - 2.76% 175. 🇦🇷 Argentina - 2.72% 177. 🇵🇭 Philippines - 2.69% 178. 🇱🇦 Laos - 2.67% 179. 🇯🇵 Japan - 2.66% 180. 🇳🇪 Niger - 2.65% 181. 🇰🇷 South Korea - 2.64% 182. 🇮🇩 Indonesia - 2.63% 187. 🇲🇱 Mali - 2.46% 188. 🇸🇬 Singapore - 2.45% 189. 🇹🇱 East Timor - 2.41% 190. 🇵🇪 Peru - 2.36% 191. 🇲🇲 Myanmar - 2.28% 192. 🇧🇳 Brunei - 1.83% According to the Global Burden of Disease study, IHME, as measured by percentage of the population affected.
    Like
    4
    0 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 2KB Ansichten
  • OFFICIAL: letter sent to the Premier League regarding scrapping VAR.

    "Wolves have formally submitted a resolution to the Premier League to trigger a vote at the league's AGM in June, on the removal of VAR from the start of the 2024/25 season.

    The introduction of VAR in 2019/20 was a decision made in good faith and with the best interests of football and the Premier League at its heart. However, it has led to numerous unintended negative consequences that are damaging the relationship between fans and football, and undermining the value of the Premier League brand, which include:

    • Impact on goal celebrations and the spontaneous passion that makes football special.

    • Frustration and confusion inside stadiums due to lengthy VAR checks and poor communication.

    •A more hostile atmosphere with protests, booing of the Premier League anthem and chants against VAR.

    • Overreach of VAR's original purpose to correct clear and obvious mistakes, now overanalysing subjective decisions and compromising the game's fluidity and integrity.

    • Diminished accountability of on-field officials, due to safety net of VAR, leading to an erosion of authority on the pitch.

    • Continued errors despite VAR, with supporters unable to accept human error after multiple views and replays, damaging confidence in officiating standards.

    • Disruption of the Premier League's fast pace with lengthy VAR checks and more added time, causing matches to run excessively long.

    • Constant discourse about VAR decisions often overshadowing the match itself, and tarnishing the reputation of the league.

    • Erosion of trust and reputation, with VAR fuelling completely nonsensical allegations of corruption.

    The decision to table the resolution has come after careful consideration and with the utmost respect for the Premier League, PGMOL and our fellow competitors.

    There is no blame to be placed - we are all just looking for the best possible outcome for football - and all stakeholders have been working hard to try and make the introduction of additional technology a success.

    However, after five seasons of VAR in the Premier League it is time for a constructive and critical debate on its future.

    Our position is that the price we are paying for a small increase in accuracy is at odds with the spirit of our game, and as a result we should remove it from the 2024/25 season onwards."
    🚨📺 OFFICIAL: letter sent to the Premier League regarding scrapping VAR. "Wolves have formally submitted a resolution to the Premier League to trigger a vote at the league's AGM in June, on the removal of VAR from the start of the 2024/25 season. The introduction of VAR in 2019/20 was a decision made in good faith and with the best interests of football and the Premier League at its heart. However, it has led to numerous unintended negative consequences that are damaging the relationship between fans and football, and undermining the value of the Premier League brand, which include: • Impact on goal celebrations and the spontaneous passion that makes football special. • Frustration and confusion inside stadiums due to lengthy VAR checks and poor communication. •A more hostile atmosphere with protests, booing of the Premier League anthem and chants against VAR. • Overreach of VAR's original purpose to correct clear and obvious mistakes, now overanalysing subjective decisions and compromising the game's fluidity and integrity. • Diminished accountability of on-field officials, due to safety net of VAR, leading to an erosion of authority on the pitch. • Continued errors despite VAR, with supporters unable to accept human error after multiple views and replays, damaging confidence in officiating standards. • Disruption of the Premier League's fast pace with lengthy VAR checks and more added time, causing matches to run excessively long. • Constant discourse about VAR decisions often overshadowing the match itself, and tarnishing the reputation of the league. • Erosion of trust and reputation, with VAR fuelling completely nonsensical allegations of corruption. The decision to table the resolution has come after careful consideration and with the utmost respect for the Premier League, PGMOL and our fellow competitors. There is no blame to be placed - we are all just looking for the best possible outcome for football - and all stakeholders have been working hard to try and make the introduction of additional technology a success. However, after five seasons of VAR in the Premier League it is time for a constructive and critical debate on its future. Our position is that the price we are paying for a small increase in accuracy is at odds with the spirit of our game, and as a result we should remove it from the 2024/25 season onwards."
    Like
    Love
    5
    1 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 1KB Ansichten
  • Bae and I
    Bae and I
    Like
    Wow
    6
    0 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 1KB Ansichten