• Love
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 751 Views
  • Love
    Like
    3
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 687 Views
  • Like
    Love
    2
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 752 Views
  • fine vinei
    fine vinei๐Ÿ˜
    Like
    4
    1 Commenti 0 condivisioni 2K Views
  • Napoleon's death mask is cast in bronze. The original cast was created 40 hours after his death in 1821. During this era, it was customary to create a death mask for prominent leaders when they died.

    A mixture of wax or plaster was applied to Napoleon's face and removed once it had solidified.

    Subsequent copies were made from this impression by casting them. The origins and current locations of the original cast molds are shrouded in mystery and controversy.
    Napoleon's death mask is cast in bronze. The original cast was created 40 hours after his death in 1821. During this era, it was customary to create a death mask for prominent leaders when they died. A mixture of wax or plaster was applied to Napoleon's face and removed once it had solidified. Subsequent copies were made from this impression by casting them. The origins and current locations of the original cast molds are shrouded in mystery and controversy.
    Like
    2
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 870 Views
  • Bro kept fainting after police found 50 kilos
    Bro kept fainting after police found 50 kilos ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ
    Like
    Haha
    5
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 1K Views 228
  • Fela Kuti is the Most Persecuted Musician in History. He was arrested over 200 times, and appeared in court 356 times for mostly criticising the Nigerian Government.

    1,000 soldiers attacked his property in 1977.

    He performed on stage in bandages, even after being assaulted.
    Fela Kuti is the Most Persecuted Musician in History. He was arrested over 200 times, and appeared in court 356 times for mostly criticising the Nigerian Government. 1,000 soldiers attacked his property in 1977. He performed on stage in bandages, even after being assaulted.
    Like
    3
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 2K Views
  • Depression rate by country:

    1. Greenland - 6.61%
    2. Greece - 6.52%
    3. Spain - 6.04%
    4. Portugal - 5.88%
    5. Palestine - 5.75%
    5. Tunisia - 5.75%
    7. Bahrain - 5.52%
    8. Morocco - 5.49%
    9. Iran - 5.48%
    10. Lithuania - 5.42%
    ~
    11. Ukraine - 5.25%
    12. Monaco - 5.21%
    13. Latvia - 5.16%
    16. Suriname - 5.1%
    17. Estonia - 5.09%
    19. Lebanon - 5.06%
    20. Australia - 5.05%
    21. Belarus - 5.04%
    22. United Kingdom - 5.02%
    24. Finland - 5.00%
    25. Ireland - 4.99%
    26. Sweden - 4.98%
    29. USa - 4.92%
    30. Kuwait - 4.90%
    31. Saudi Arabia - 4.90%
    33. France - 4.74%
    34. Switzerland - 4.72%
    35. Bangladesh - 4.67%
    38. Andorra - 4.65%
    39. Nepal - 4.64%
    40. Equatorial Guinea - 4.63%
    43. Italy - 4.62%
    44. Turkey - 4.60%
    45. Israel - 4.55%
    47. Uganda - 4.48%
    48. South Africa - 4.45%
    49. Denmark - 4.41%
    50. Netherlands - 4.41%
    51. Syria - 4.39%
    52. Belgium - 4.36%
    53. Oman - 4.33%
    54. Germany - 4.32%
    55. Brazil - 4.29%
    56. Chile - 4.28%
    57. Slovenia - 4.28%
    63. Rwanda - 4.20%
    64. Yemen - 4.20%
    65. Jordan - 4.19%
    67. Botswana - 4.16%
    68. Croatia - 4.13%
    71. Mongolia - 4.07%
    72. Bhutan - 4.06%
    73. Luxembourg - 4.02%
    76. Malaysia - 3.99%
    77. Comoros - 3.97%
    78. Afghanistan - 3.96%
    79. Barbados - 3.96%
    80. Austria - 3.95%
    84. Russia - 3.91%
    85. Hungary - 3.89%
    86. Iraq - 3.89%
    88. Egypt - 3.87%
    89. Eswatini - 3.87%
    90. Mexico - 3.87%
    92. Norway - 3.85%
    93. Czech Republic - 3.84%
    98. Canada - 3.74%
    99. Bulgaria - 3.73%
    100. Kazakhstan - 3.72%
    103. Thailand - 3.70%
    104. India - 3.69%
    105. Serbia - 3.69%
    106. Grenada - 3.68%
    109. China - 3.67%
    112. El Salvador - 3.61%
    114. Taiwan - 3.59%
    117. Slovakia - 3.56%
    120. Venezuela - 3.53%
    121. Iceland - 3.52%
    124. Romania - 3.51%
    126. South Sudan - 3.48%
    130. Jamaica - 3.44%
    131. Ethiopia - 3.41%
    132. Guatemala - 3.41%
    133. Burundi - 3.39%
    139. Kyrgyzstan - 3.31%
    140. Somalia - 3.31%
    141. North Korea - 3.30%
    145. Bolivia - 3.26%
    146. Namibia - 3.26%
    148. Sri Lanka - 3.26%
    149. Pakistan - 3.23%
    153. Maldives - 3.15%
    154. Panama - 3.15%
    155. Senegal - 3.15%
    158. Uzbekistan - 3.12%
    159. Turkmenistan - 3.11%
    162. Albania - 3.05%
    164. Fiji - 3.01%
    165. Poland - 2.98%
    166. Mauritania - 2.94%
    167. Cambodia - 2.89%
    170. Vietnam - 2.83%
    173. Nigeria - 2.76%
    174. Zimbabwe - 2.76%
    175. Argentina - 2.72%
    177. Philippines - 2.69%
    178. Laos - 2.67%
    179. Japan - 2.66%
    180. Niger - 2.65%
    181. South Korea - 2.64%
    182. Indonesia - 2.63%
    187. Mali - 2.46%
    188. Singapore - 2.45%
    189. East Timor - 2.41%
    190. Peru - 2.36%
    191. Myanmar - 2.28%
    192. Brunei - 1.83%

    According to the Global Burden of Disease study, IHME, as measured by percentage of the population affected.
    Depression rate by country: 1. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Greenland - 6.61% 2. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece - 6.52% 3. ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain - 6.04% 4. ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal - 5.88% 5. ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ Palestine - 5.75% 5. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ Tunisia - 5.75% 7. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ Bahrain - 5.52% 8. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Morocco - 5.49% 9. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran - 5.48% 10. ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania - 5.42% ~ 11. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ukraine - 5.25% 12. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡จ Monaco - 5.21% 13. ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia - 5.16% 16. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ท Suriname - 5.1% 17. ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia - 5.09% 19. ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง Lebanon - 5.06% 20. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia - 5.05% 21. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Belarus - 5.04% 22. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom - 5.02% 24. ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland - 5.00% 25. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland - 4.99% 26. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden - 4.98% 29. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USa - 4.92% 30. ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ Kuwait - 4.90% 31. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia - 4.90% 33. ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France - 4.74% 34. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland - 4.72% 35. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ Bangladesh - 4.67% 38. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Andorra - 4.65% 39. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต Nepal - 4.64% 40. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ถ Equatorial Guinea - 4.63% 43. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy - 4.62% 44. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkey - 4.60% 45. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel - 4.55% 47. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Uganda - 4.48% 48. ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ South Africa - 4.45% 49. ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark - 4.41% 50. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands - 4.41% 51. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ Syria - 4.39% 52. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium - 4.36% 53. ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿ‡ฒ Oman - 4.33% 54. ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany - 4.32% 55. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil - 4.29% 56. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Chile - 4.28% 57. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Slovenia - 4.28% 63. ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ผ Rwanda - 4.20% 64. ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช Yemen - 4.20% 65. ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Jordan - 4.19% 67. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ผ Botswana - 4.16% 68. ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia - 4.13% 71. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ Mongolia - 4.07% 72. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡น Bhutan - 4.06% 73. ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg - 4.02% 76. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia - 3.99% 77. ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Comoros - 3.97% 78. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ Afghanistan - 3.96% 79. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ง Barbados - 3.96% 80. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria - 3.95% 84. ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia - 3.91% 85. ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary - 3.89% 86. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Iraq - 3.89% 88. ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Egypt - 3.87% 89. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Eswatini - 3.87% 90. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico - 3.87% 92. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway - 3.85% 93. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czech Republic - 3.84% 98. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada - 3.74% 99. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria - 3.73% 100. ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Kazakhstan - 3.72% 103. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand - 3.70% 104. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India - 3.69% 105. ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia - 3.69% 106. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Grenada - 3.68% 109. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China - 3.67% 112. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป El Salvador - 3.61% 114. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan - 3.59% 117. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Slovakia - 3.56% 120. ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ช Venezuela - 3.53% 121. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland - 3.52% 124. ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania - 3.51% 126. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ South Sudan - 3.48% 130. ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Jamaica - 3.44% 131. ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡น Ethiopia - 3.41% 132. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡น Guatemala - 3.41% 133. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฎ Burundi - 3.39% 139. ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Kyrgyzstan - 3.31% 140. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด Somalia - 3.31% 141. ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต North Korea - 3.30% 145. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ด Bolivia - 3.26% 146. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Namibia - 3.26% 148. ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Sri Lanka - 3.26% 149. ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan - 3.23% 153. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ป Maldives - 3.15% 154. ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ Panama - 3.15% 155. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ณ Senegal - 3.15% 158. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan - 3.12% 159. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฒ Turkmenistan - 3.11% 162. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Albania - 3.05% 164. ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฏ Fiji - 3.01% 165. ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland - 2.98% 166. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ท Mauritania - 2.94% 167. ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ Cambodia - 2.89% 170. ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Vietnam - 2.83% 173. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria - 2.76% 174. ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ผ Zimbabwe - 2.76% 175. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina - 2.72% 177. ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ Philippines - 2.69% 178. ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Laos - 2.67% 179. ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan - 2.66% 180. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ช Niger - 2.65% 181. ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea - 2.64% 182. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia - 2.63% 187. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Mali - 2.46% 188. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore - 2.45% 189. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฑ East Timor - 2.41% 190. ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Peru - 2.36% 191. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Myanmar - 2.28% 192. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ Brunei - 1.83% According to the Global Burden of Disease study, IHME, as measured by percentage of the population affected.
    Like
    4
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 2K Views
  • OFFICIAL: letter sent to the Premier League regarding scrapping VAR.

    "Wolves have formally submitted a resolution to the Premier League to trigger a vote at the league's AGM in June, on the removal of VAR from the start of the 2024/25 season.

    The introduction of VAR in 2019/20 was a decision made in good faith and with the best interests of football and the Premier League at its heart. However, it has led to numerous unintended negative consequences that are damaging the relationship between fans and football, and undermining the value of the Premier League brand, which include:

    • Impact on goal celebrations and the spontaneous passion that makes football special.

    • Frustration and confusion inside stadiums due to lengthy VAR checks and poor communication.

    •A more hostile atmosphere with protests, booing of the Premier League anthem and chants against VAR.

    • Overreach of VAR's original purpose to correct clear and obvious mistakes, now overanalysing subjective decisions and compromising the game's fluidity and integrity.

    • Diminished accountability of on-field officials, due to safety net of VAR, leading to an erosion of authority on the pitch.

    • Continued errors despite VAR, with supporters unable to accept human error after multiple views and replays, damaging confidence in officiating standards.

    • Disruption of the Premier League's fast pace with lengthy VAR checks and more added time, causing matches to run excessively long.

    • Constant discourse about VAR decisions often overshadowing the match itself, and tarnishing the reputation of the league.

    • Erosion of trust and reputation, with VAR fuelling completely nonsensical allegations of corruption.

    The decision to table the resolution has come after careful consideration and with the utmost respect for the Premier League, PGMOL and our fellow competitors.

    There is no blame to be placed - we are all just looking for the best possible outcome for football - and all stakeholders have been working hard to try and make the introduction of additional technology a success.

    However, after five seasons of VAR in the Premier League it is time for a constructive and critical debate on its future.

    Our position is that the price we are paying for a small increase in accuracy is at odds with the spirit of our game, and as a result we should remove it from the 2024/25 season onwards."
    ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ“บ OFFICIAL: letter sent to the Premier League regarding scrapping VAR. "Wolves have formally submitted a resolution to the Premier League to trigger a vote at the league's AGM in June, on the removal of VAR from the start of the 2024/25 season. The introduction of VAR in 2019/20 was a decision made in good faith and with the best interests of football and the Premier League at its heart. However, it has led to numerous unintended negative consequences that are damaging the relationship between fans and football, and undermining the value of the Premier League brand, which include: • Impact on goal celebrations and the spontaneous passion that makes football special. • Frustration and confusion inside stadiums due to lengthy VAR checks and poor communication. •A more hostile atmosphere with protests, booing of the Premier League anthem and chants against VAR. • Overreach of VAR's original purpose to correct clear and obvious mistakes, now overanalysing subjective decisions and compromising the game's fluidity and integrity. • Diminished accountability of on-field officials, due to safety net of VAR, leading to an erosion of authority on the pitch. • Continued errors despite VAR, with supporters unable to accept human error after multiple views and replays, damaging confidence in officiating standards. • Disruption of the Premier League's fast pace with lengthy VAR checks and more added time, causing matches to run excessively long. • Constant discourse about VAR decisions often overshadowing the match itself, and tarnishing the reputation of the league. • Erosion of trust and reputation, with VAR fuelling completely nonsensical allegations of corruption. The decision to table the resolution has come after careful consideration and with the utmost respect for the Premier League, PGMOL and our fellow competitors. There is no blame to be placed - we are all just looking for the best possible outcome for football - and all stakeholders have been working hard to try and make the introduction of additional technology a success. However, after five seasons of VAR in the Premier League it is time for a constructive and critical debate on its future. Our position is that the price we are paying for a small increase in accuracy is at odds with the spirit of our game, and as a result we should remove it from the 2024/25 season onwards."
    Like
    Love
    5
    1 Commenti 0 condivisioni 1K Views
  • Bae and I
    Bae and I
    Like
    Wow
    6
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 1K Views